LOS ANGELES,
July 13 /PRNewswire/ -- Over twenty executives representing key Southern California
economic sectors signed a strongly worded letter to President Clinton and members of
Congress urging resolution to California's water woes in Northern California with a
conclusion to the arduous CALFED process, according to a consortium of organizations
chaired by Richard Heckmann, President and CEO of U.S. Filter Corporation which released
the letter today."We write to
urge that the Federal government support efforts by United States Secretary of the
Interior Bruce Babbitt and Governor Pete Wilson to reach agreement on a preferred CALFED
alternative for the restoration of the Northern California Bay-Delta, in a manner that
would secure clean water and supply reliability for Southern California," wrote the
executives.
For Southern California it is important that the
CALFED program include water storage and water quality components to ensure that its
supplies meet EPA safe drinking water standards with adequate supply reliability. Without
those two elements water conservation, the environment, and Southern California's economic
vitality will be compromised, the executives concluded.
Heckmann stated: "It is wrong to say that fixing
water quality and supply reliability in and from the Bay-Delta represents an effort by
Southern California to drain Northern California dry. In fact, dealing with Bay-Delta
problems in only a part of the solution to Southern California's water supply reliability
future. The major part is facilitating regional water transfers from willing sellers to
willing buyers, expanding water recycling and conservation. Ail portions need to move
forward now."
"For each 100 milligrams of added salinity in
water from the Bay-Delta, Southern California faces approximately $100 million in added
costs to ratepayers, the letter asserts.
Larry Kosmont, President of Kosmont and Associates
which publishes the annual Cost of Doing Business Survey observed: "Fixing the
Bay-Delta is important to Southern California. It is not hard to estimate that without
good water quality and supply reliability Southern California will not be able to sustain
its economic vitality. Unless we fix the quality and supply problem in the Bay-Delta, we
will have to bear the costs of meeting federal regulations and demand locally, while also
being expected to share the cost of fixing the environment in the North. This can have the
effect of driving costs up and jobs away."
The following is the text of the letter to President
Clinton and members of Congress urging resolution to California's water woes in Northern
California:
Dear President Clinton and Members of Congress:
We write to urge that the Federal government support
efforts by United States Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt and Governor Pete Wilson
to reach agreement on a preferred CALFED alternative for the restoration of the Northern
California Bay-Delta, in a manner that would secure clean water and supply reliability for
Southern California. If the CALFED process fails to reach a comprehensive preferred
alternative by the end of 1998, the prospect of an inadequate water supply and
questionable drinking water quality will
impair confidence in our economy and regional quality
for life.
As representatives of the business community in
Southern California we are concerned that while our region has paid for its full
allocation of water from the State Water Project we have received only half of our
entitlement. According to a 1996 Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce study, this
situation compelled Southern California resource agencies and taxpayers to invest
$8 billion in regional storage
facilities, water recycling and landmark water conservation programs that could be
jeopardized if water quality and supplies from the Bay-Delta continue to erode.
Southern California has benefited from a remarkable
alliance of business, environmentalists and government agencies on issues of water. Our
success means that today, the Southern California region uses less water than it did in
1975 despite a population growth of 5 million residents. Yet, for each 100 milligrams of
added salinity in water from the Bay-Delta, Southern California faces approximately $100
million in added costs to rate payers.
Added water treatment costs in the Southern
California region resulting from poor water quality in the Bay-Delta will not only reverse
regional conservation and water recycling, but, as a result hurt efforts to clean coastal
areas and groundwater aquifers. To have good water supply quality our region must blend
Colorado River water with water from the Bay-Delta to lower salinity. The lack of a
reliable water supply from the Bay-Delta could also impede efforts to maximize our use of
regional supplies through agricultural-urban water marketing currently under discussion in
California.
Much is at stake in Secretary Babbitt and Governor
Wilson's efforts to reach agreement on a viable program to meet California's water supply
and environmental needs. Therefore we urge that the Federal government match the
commitment proposed by Governor Wilson in his fiscal year 1998-99 budget as well as other
state financing vehicle for Bay-Delta facilities planning. For Southern California it is
important that the CALFED program include water storage and water quality components to
ensure that our supplies meet EPA safe drinking water standards with adequate supply
reliability. Without those two elements water conservation, the environment, and our
economic vitality will be compromised.